Loading...

National Institute of Mental Health Data Archive (NDA) Sign In
National Institute of Mental Health Data Archive (NDA) Sign In
NDA

Success! An email is on its way!

Please check your email to complete the linking process. The link you receive is only valid for 30 minutes.

Check your spam or junk folder if you do not receive the email in the next few minutes.

Warning Notice This is a U.S. Government computer system, which may be accessed and used only for authorized Government business by authorized personnel. Unauthorized access or use of this computer system may subject violators to criminal, civil, and/or administrative action. All information on this computer system may be intercepted, recorded, read, copied, and disclosed by and to authorized personnel for official purposes, including criminal investigations. Such information includes sensitive data encrypted to comply with confidentiality and privacy requirements. Access or use of this computer system by any person, whether authorized or unauthorized, constitutes consent to these terms. There is no right of privacy in this system.
Create or Link an Existing NDA Account
NIMH Data Archive (NDA) Sign In or Create An Account
Update Password

You have logged in with a temporary password. Please update your password. Passwords must contain 8 or more characters and must contain at least 3 of the following types of characters:

  • Uppercase
  • Lowercase
  • Numbers
  • Special Characters limited to: %,_,!,@,#,$,-,%,&,+,=,),(,*,^,:,;

Subscribe to our mailing list

Mailing List(s)
Email Format

You are now leaving the NIMH Data Archive (NDA) web site to go to:

Click on the address above if the page does not change within 10 seconds.

Disclaimer

NDA is not responsible for the content of this external site and does not monitor other web sites for accuracy.

Accept Terms
Data Access Terms - Decline Terms

Are you sure you want to cancel? This will decline terms and you will not be authorized for access.

Stages of Change

456 Shared Subjects

N/A
Clinical Assessments
Questionnaire
01/05/2015
soc01

View Change History
01
Query Element Name Data Type Size Required Description Value Range Notes Aliases
subjectkey GUID Required The NDAR Global Unique Identifier (GUID) for research subject NDAR*
src_subject_id String 20 Required Subject ID how it's defined in lab/project patid
interview_date Date Required Date on which the interview/genetic test/sampling/imaging/biospecimen was completed. MM/DD/YYYY
interview_age Integer Required Age in months at the time of the interview/test/sampling/imaging. 0::1440 Age is rounded to chronological month. If the research participant is 15-days-old at time of interview, the appropriate value would be 0 months. If the participant is 16-days-old, the value would be 1 month.
sex String 20 Required Sex of subject at birth M;F; O; NR M = Male; F = Female; O=Other; NR = Not reported gender
Query asstyp Integer Recommended Assessment type 1::20 1=TADS GATE A; 2=TADS GATE B; 3 = TADS Gate C; 4 = TADS Week 6; 5 = TADS Week 12; 6 = TADS Week 18; 7 = TADS Week 24; 8 = TADS Week 30; 9 = TADS Week 36; 10 = TADS F/U Mo 3; 11 = TADS F/U Mo 6; 12 = TADS F/U Mo 9; 13 = TADS F/U Mo 12; 14 = SOFTAD month 6; 15 = SOFTAD month 12; 16 = SOFTAD month 18; 17 = SOFTAD month 24; 18 = SOFTAD month 30; 19 = SOFTAD month 36; 20 = SOFTAD month 42
Query bsit0 Float Recommended Weeks from Time 0/baseline to assessment soct0
Query stage Integer Recommended Study stage
0::5; 51::53; 67; -888; -999
0 = Pre-Randomization (TADS) 1 = Stage 1 (TADS) 2 = Stage 2 (TADS) 3 = Stage 3 (TADS) 4 = Stage 4 (TADS) 5 = Stage 5 (SOFTAD); 51=Treatmentas Usual; 52=Screening Alone; 53=Intervention; 67=Unknown; -888=Not Applicable; -999=Missing;
Query soc1_u Integer Recommended Question 1. I think I might be ready to improve myself. 1::4 1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
Query soc2_u Integer Recommended Question 2. I am doing something about the problems that have been bothering me. 1::4 1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
Query soc3_u Integer Recommended Question 3. It might be a good thing and worth it to work on my problems. 1::4 1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
Query soc4_u Integer Recommended Question 4. I'm not the one with the problem. It doesn't make much sense for me to be here. 1::4 4 = Strongly Disagree; 3 = Disagree; 2 = Agree1 = Strongly Agree
Query soc5_u Integer Recommended Question 5. It worries me that problems I have already changed might come back, so I am here to get help. 1::4 1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
Query soc6_u Integer Recommended Question 6. I am finally doing some work on the problems. 1::4 1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
Query soc7_u Integer Recommended Question 7. I've been thinking that I might want to change something about myself. 1::4 1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
Query soc8_u Integer Recommended Question 8. Being here is pretty much a waste of time for me because problems don't have to do with me. 1::4 4 = Strongly Disagree; 3 = Disagree; 2 = Agree1 = Strongly Agree
Query soc9_u Integer Recommended Question 9. I guess I have faults, but there's nothing I really need to change. 1::4 4 = Strongly Disagree; 3 = Disagree; 2 = Agree1 = Strongly Agree
Query soc10_u Integer Recommended Question 10. I have a problem and I really think I should work on it. 1::4 1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
Query soc11_u Integer Recommended Question 11. Even though sometimes I have trouble changing, at least I am working on my problems. 1::4 1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
Query soc12_u Integer Recommended Question 12. I might need help right now for me to keep up the changes I've already made. 1::4 1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
Query soc13_u Integer Recommended Question 13. I may be part of the problem, but I don't really think I am. 1::4 4 = Strongly Disagree; 3 = Disagree; 2 = Agree1 = Strongly Agree
Query soc14_u Integer Recommended Question 14. Anyone can talk about changing, but I'm really doing something about it. 1::4 1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
Query soc15_u Integer Recommended Question 15. All this talk about behavior is boring. Why can't people just forget about their problems? 1::4 4 = Strongly Disagree; 3 = Disagree; 2 = Agree1 = Strongly Agree
Query soc16_u Integer Recommended Question 16. I'm here to keep my problems from coming back. 1::4 1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
Query soc17_u Integer Recommended Question 17. I am actively working on my problems. 1::4 1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
Query soc18_u Integer Recommended Question 18. After all I have done to try and change my problems, they sometimes come back to bother me. 1::4 1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
Query soc1 Integer Recommended Question 1. I think I might be ready to improve myself. (Imputed Version). Imputation Rule: If less than 4 of SOC1_U through SOC18_U are missing and SOC1 missing then SOC1 = integer(median of non- missing(SOC1_U through SOC18_U)) 1::4 1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
Query soc2 Integer Recommended Question 2. I am doing something about the problems that have been bothering me. (Imputed Version). Imputation Rule: If less than 4 of SOC1_U through SOC18_U are missing and SOC2 missing then SOC2 = integer(median of non- missing(SOC1_U through SOC18_U)) 1::4 1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
Query soc3 Integer Recommended Question 3. It might be a good thing and worth it to work on my problems. (Imputed Version). Imputation Rule: If less than 4 of SOC1_U through SOC18_U are missing and SOC3 missing then SOC3 = integer(median of non- missing(SOC1_U through SOC18_U)) 1::4 1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
Query soc4 Integer Recommended Question 4. I'm not the one with the problem. It doesn't make much sense for me to be here. (Imputed Version). Imputation Rule: If less than 4 of SOC1_U through SOC18_U are missing and SOC4 missing then SOC4 = integer(median of non- missing(SOC1_U through SOC18_U)) 1::4 4 = Strongly Disagree; 3 = Disagree; 2 = Agree1 = Strongly Agree
Query soc5 Integer Recommended Question 5. It worries me that problems I have already changed might come back, so I am here to get help. (Imputed Version). Imputation Rule: If less than 4 of SOC1_U through SOC18_U are missing and SOC5 missing then SOC5 = integer(median of non- missing(SOC1_U through SOC18_U)) 1::4 1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
Query soc6 Integer Recommended Question 6. I am finally doing some work on the problems. (Imputed Version). Imputation Rule: If less than 4 of SOC1_U through SOC18_U are missing and SOC6 missing then SOC6 = integer(median of non- missing(SOC1_U through SOC18_U)) 1::4 1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
Query soc7 Integer Recommended Question 7. I've been thinking that I might want to change something about myself. (Imputed Version). Imputation Rule: If less than 4 of SOC1_U through SOC18_U are missing and SOC7 missing then SOC7 = integer(median of non- missing(SOC1_U through SOC18_U)) 1::4 1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
Query soc8 Integer Recommended Question 8. Being here is pretty much a waste of time for me because problems don't have to do with me. (Imputed Version). Imputation Rule: If less than 4 of SOC1_U through SOC18_U are missing and SOC8 missing then SOC8 = integer(median of non- missing(SOC1_U through SOC18_U)) 1::4 4 = Strongly Disagree; 3 = Disagree; 2 = Agree1 = Strongly Agree
Query soc9 Integer Recommended Question 9. I guess I have faults, but there's nothing I really need to change. (Imputed Version). Imputation Rule: If less than 4 of SOC1_U through SOC18_U are missing and SOC9 missing then SOC9 = integer(median of non- missing(SOC1_U through SOC18_U)) 1::4 4 = Strongly Disagree; 3 = Disagree; 2 = Agree1 = Strongly Agree
Query soc10 Integer Recommended Question 10. I have a problem and I really think I should work on it. (Imputed Version). Imputation Rule: If less than 4 of SOC1_U through SOC18_U are missing and SOC10 missing then SOC10 = integer(median of non- missing(SOC1_U through SOC18_U)) 1::4 1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
Query soc11 Integer Recommended Question 11. Even though sometimes I have trouble changing, at least I am working on my problems. (Imputed Version). Imputation Rule: If less than 4 of SOC1_U through SOC18_U are missing and SOC11 missing then SOC11 = integer(median of non- missing(SOC1_U through SOC18_U)) 1::4 1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
Query soc12 Integer Recommended Question 12. I might need help right now for me to keep up the changes I've already made. (Imputed Version). Imputation Rule: If less than 4 of SOC1_U through SOC18_U are missing and SOC12 missing then SOC12 = integer(median of non- missing(SOC1_U through SOC18_U)) 1::4 1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
Query soc13 Integer Recommended Question 13. I may be part of the problem, but I don't really think I am. (Imputed Version). Imputation Rule: If less than 4 of SOC1_U through SOC18_U are missing and SOC13 missing then SOC13 = integer(median of non- missing(SOC1_U through SOC18_U)) 1::4 4 = Strongly Disagree; 3 = Disagree; 2 = Agree1 = Strongly Agree
Query soc14 Integer Recommended Question 14. Anyone can talk about changing, but I'm really doing something about it. (Imputed Version). Imputation Rule: If less than 4 of SOC1_U through SOC18_U are missing and SOC14 missing then SOC14 = integer(median of non- missing(SOC1_U through SOC18_U)) 1::4 1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
Query soc15 Integer Recommended Question 15. All this talk about behavior is boring. Why can't people just forget about their problems? (Imputed Version). Imputation Rule: If less than 4 of SOC1_U through SOC18_U are missing and SOC15 missing then SOC15 = integer(median of non- missing(SOC1_U through SOC18_U)) 1::4 4 = Strongly Disagree; 3 = Disagree; 2 = Agree1 = Strongly Agree
Query soc16 Integer Recommended Question 16. I'm here to keep my problems from coming back. (Imputed Version). Imputation Rule: If less than 4 of SOC1_U through SOC18_U are missing and SOC16 missing then SOC16 = integer(median of non- missing(SOC1_U through SOC18_U)) 1::4 1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
Query soc17 Integer Recommended Question 17. I am actively working on my problems. (Imputed Version). Imputation Rule: If less than 4 of SOC1_U through SOC18_U are missing and SOC17 missing then SOC17 = integer(median of non- missing(SOC1_U through SOC18_U)) 1::4 1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
Query soc18 Integer Recommended Question 18. After all I have done to try and change my problems, they sometimes come back to bother me. (Imputed Version). Imputation Rule: If less than 4 of SOC1_U through SOC18_U are missing and SOC18 missing then SOC18 = integer(median of non- missing(SOC1_U through SOC18_U)) 1::4 1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
Query soctot Integer Recommended SOC Total Score (un-validated) using imputed values. 18::72 Items included in score: SOC1, SOC2, SOC3, SOC4, SOC5, SOC6, SOC7, SOC8, SOC9, SOC10, SOC11, SOC12, SOC13, SOC14, SOC15, SOC16, SOC17, SOC18
Data Structure

This page displays the data structure defined for the measure identified in the title and structure short name. The table below displays a list of data elements in this structure (also called variables) and the following information:

  • Element Name: This is the standard element name
  • Data Type: Which type of data this element is, e.g. String, Float, File location.
  • Size: If applicable, the character limit of this element
  • Required: This column displays whether the element is Required for valid submissions, Recommended for valid submissions, Conditional on other elements, or Optional
  • Description: A basic description
  • Value Range: Which values can appear validly in this element (case sensitive for strings)
  • Notes: Expanded description or notes on coding of values
  • Aliases: A list of currently supported Aliases (alternate element names)
  • For valid elements with shared data, on the far left is a Filter button you can use to view a summary of shared data for that element and apply a query filter to your Cart based on selected value ranges

At the top of this page you can also:

  • Use the search bar to filter the elements displayed. This will not filter on the Size of Required columns
  • Download a copy of this definition in CSV format
  • Download a blank CSV submission template prepopulated with the correct structure header rows ready to fill with subject records and upload

Please email the The NDA Help Desk with any questions.