|
subjectkey |
GUID |
|
Required |
The NDAR Global Unique Identifier (GUID) for research subject |
NDAR*
|
|
|
|
src_subject_id |
String |
20
|
Required |
Subject ID how it's defined in lab/project |
|
|
patid |
|
interview_date |
Date |
|
Required |
Date on which the interview/genetic test/sampling/imaging/biospecimen was completed. MM/DD/YYYY |
|
|
|
|
interview_age |
Integer |
|
Required |
Age in months at the time of the interview/test/sampling/imaging. |
0::1440
|
Age is rounded to chronological month. If the research participant is 15-days-old at time of interview, the appropriate value would be 0 months. If the participant is 16-days-old, the value would be 1 month.
|
|
|
sex |
String |
20
|
Required |
Sex of subject at birth |
M;F; O; NR
|
M = Male; F = Female; O=Other; NR = Not reported
|
gender |
Query
|
asstyp |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Assessment type |
1::20
|
1=TADS GATE A; 2=TADS GATE B; 3 = TADS Gate C; 4 = TADS Week 6; 5 = TADS Week 12; 6 = TADS Week 18; 7 = TADS Week 24; 8 = TADS Week 30; 9 = TADS Week 36; 10 = TADS F/U Mo 3; 11 = TADS F/U Mo 6; 12 = TADS F/U Mo 9; 13 = TADS F/U Mo 12; 14 = SOFTAD month 6; 15 = SOFTAD month 12; 16 = SOFTAD month 18; 17 = SOFTAD month 24; 18 = SOFTAD month 30; 19 = SOFTAD month 36; 20 = SOFTAD month 42
|
|
Query
|
bsit0 |
Float |
|
Recommended |
Weeks from Time 0/baseline to assessment |
|
|
soct0 |
Query
|
stage |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Study stage |
|
0 = Pre-Randomization (TADS) 1 = Stage 1 (TADS) 2 = Stage 2 (TADS) 3 = Stage 3 (TADS) 4 = Stage 4 (TADS) 5 = Stage 5 (SOFTAD); 51=Treatmentas Usual; 52=Screening Alone; 53=Intervention; 67=Unknown; -888=Not Applicable; -999=Missing;
|
|
Query
|
soc1_u |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Question 1. I think I might be ready to improve myself. |
1::4
|
1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
|
|
Query
|
soc2_u |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Question 2. I am doing something about the problems that have been bothering me. |
1::4
|
1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
|
|
Query
|
soc3_u |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Question 3. It might be a good thing and worth it to work on my problems. |
1::4
|
1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
|
|
Query
|
soc4_u |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Question 4. I'm not the one with the problem. It doesn't make much sense for me to be here. |
1::4
|
4 = Strongly Disagree; 3 = Disagree; 2 = Agree1 = Strongly Agree
|
|
Query
|
soc5_u |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Question 5. It worries me that problems I have already changed might come back, so I am here to get help. |
1::4
|
1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
|
|
Query
|
soc6_u |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Question 6. I am finally doing some work on the problems. |
1::4
|
1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
|
|
Query
|
soc7_u |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Question 7. I've been thinking that I might want to change something about myself. |
1::4
|
1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
|
|
Query
|
soc8_u |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Question 8. Being here is pretty much a waste of time for me because problems don't have to do with me. |
1::4
|
4 = Strongly Disagree; 3 = Disagree; 2 = Agree1 = Strongly Agree
|
|
Query
|
soc9_u |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Question 9. I guess I have faults, but there's nothing I really need to change. |
1::4
|
4 = Strongly Disagree; 3 = Disagree; 2 = Agree1 = Strongly Agree
|
|
Query
|
soc10_u |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Question 10. I have a problem and I really think I should work on it. |
1::4
|
1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
|
|
Query
|
soc11_u |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Question 11. Even though sometimes I have trouble changing, at least I am working on my problems. |
1::4
|
1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
|
|
Query
|
soc12_u |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Question 12. I might need help right now for me to keep up the changes I've already made. |
1::4
|
1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
|
|
Query
|
soc13_u |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Question 13. I may be part of the problem, but I don't really think I am. |
1::4
|
4 = Strongly Disagree; 3 = Disagree; 2 = Agree1 = Strongly Agree
|
|
Query
|
soc14_u |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Question 14. Anyone can talk about changing, but I'm really doing something about it. |
1::4
|
1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
|
|
Query
|
soc15_u |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Question 15. All this talk about behavior is boring. Why can't people just forget about their problems? |
1::4
|
4 = Strongly Disagree; 3 = Disagree; 2 = Agree1 = Strongly Agree
|
|
Query
|
soc16_u |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Question 16. I'm here to keep my problems from coming back. |
1::4
|
1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
|
|
Query
|
soc17_u |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Question 17. I am actively working on my problems. |
1::4
|
1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
|
|
Query
|
soc18_u |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Question 18. After all I have done to try and change my problems, they sometimes come back to bother me. |
1::4
|
1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
|
|
Query
|
soc1 |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Question 1. I think I might be ready to improve myself. (Imputed Version). Imputation Rule: If less than 4 of SOC1_U through SOC18_U are missing and SOC1 missing then SOC1 = integer(median of non- missing(SOC1_U through SOC18_U)) |
1::4
|
1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
|
|
Query
|
soc2 |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Question 2. I am doing something about the problems that have been bothering me. (Imputed Version). Imputation Rule: If less than 4 of SOC1_U through SOC18_U are missing and SOC2 missing then SOC2 = integer(median of non- missing(SOC1_U through SOC18_U)) |
1::4
|
1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
|
|
Query
|
soc3 |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Question 3. It might be a good thing and worth it to work on my problems. (Imputed Version). Imputation Rule: If less than 4 of SOC1_U through SOC18_U are missing and SOC3 missing then SOC3 = integer(median of non- missing(SOC1_U through SOC18_U)) |
1::4
|
1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
|
|
Query
|
soc4 |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Question 4. I'm not the one with the problem. It doesn't make much sense for me to be here. (Imputed Version). Imputation Rule: If less than 4 of SOC1_U through SOC18_U are missing and SOC4 missing then SOC4 = integer(median of non- missing(SOC1_U through SOC18_U)) |
1::4
|
4 = Strongly Disagree; 3 = Disagree; 2 = Agree1 = Strongly Agree
|
|
Query
|
soc5 |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Question 5. It worries me that problems I have already changed might come back, so I am here to get help. (Imputed Version). Imputation Rule: If less than 4 of SOC1_U through SOC18_U are missing and SOC5 missing then SOC5 = integer(median of non- missing(SOC1_U through SOC18_U)) |
1::4
|
1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
|
|
Query
|
soc6 |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Question 6. I am finally doing some work on the problems. (Imputed Version). Imputation Rule: If less than 4 of SOC1_U through SOC18_U are missing and SOC6 missing then SOC6 = integer(median of non- missing(SOC1_U through SOC18_U)) |
1::4
|
1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
|
|
Query
|
soc7 |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Question 7. I've been thinking that I might want to change something about myself. (Imputed Version). Imputation Rule: If less than 4 of SOC1_U through SOC18_U are missing and SOC7 missing then SOC7 = integer(median of non- missing(SOC1_U through SOC18_U)) |
1::4
|
1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
|
|
Query
|
soc8 |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Question 8. Being here is pretty much a waste of time for me because problems don't have to do with me. (Imputed Version). Imputation Rule: If less than 4 of SOC1_U through SOC18_U are missing and SOC8 missing then SOC8 = integer(median of non- missing(SOC1_U through SOC18_U)) |
1::4
|
4 = Strongly Disagree; 3 = Disagree; 2 = Agree1 = Strongly Agree
|
|
Query
|
soc9 |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Question 9. I guess I have faults, but there's nothing I really need to change. (Imputed Version). Imputation Rule: If less than 4 of SOC1_U through SOC18_U are missing and SOC9 missing then SOC9 = integer(median of non- missing(SOC1_U through SOC18_U)) |
1::4
|
4 = Strongly Disagree; 3 = Disagree; 2 = Agree1 = Strongly Agree
|
|
Query
|
soc10 |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Question 10. I have a problem and I really think I should work on it. (Imputed Version). Imputation Rule: If less than 4 of SOC1_U through SOC18_U are missing and SOC10 missing then SOC10 = integer(median of non- missing(SOC1_U through SOC18_U)) |
1::4
|
1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
|
|
Query
|
soc11 |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Question 11. Even though sometimes I have trouble changing, at least I am working on my problems. (Imputed Version). Imputation Rule: If less than 4 of SOC1_U through SOC18_U are missing and SOC11 missing then SOC11 = integer(median of non- missing(SOC1_U through SOC18_U)) |
1::4
|
1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
|
|
Query
|
soc12 |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Question 12. I might need help right now for me to keep up the changes I've already made. (Imputed Version). Imputation Rule: If less than 4 of SOC1_U through SOC18_U are missing and SOC12 missing then SOC12 = integer(median of non- missing(SOC1_U through SOC18_U)) |
1::4
|
1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
|
|
Query
|
soc13 |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Question 13. I may be part of the problem, but I don't really think I am. (Imputed Version). Imputation Rule: If less than 4 of SOC1_U through SOC18_U are missing and SOC13 missing then SOC13 = integer(median of non- missing(SOC1_U through SOC18_U)) |
1::4
|
4 = Strongly Disagree; 3 = Disagree; 2 = Agree1 = Strongly Agree
|
|
Query
|
soc14 |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Question 14. Anyone can talk about changing, but I'm really doing something about it. (Imputed Version). Imputation Rule: If less than 4 of SOC1_U through SOC18_U are missing and SOC14 missing then SOC14 = integer(median of non- missing(SOC1_U through SOC18_U)) |
1::4
|
1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
|
|
Query
|
soc15 |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Question 15. All this talk about behavior is boring. Why can't people just forget about their problems? (Imputed Version). Imputation Rule: If less than 4 of SOC1_U through SOC18_U are missing and SOC15 missing then SOC15 = integer(median of non- missing(SOC1_U through SOC18_U)) |
1::4
|
4 = Strongly Disagree; 3 = Disagree; 2 = Agree1 = Strongly Agree
|
|
Query
|
soc16 |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Question 16. I'm here to keep my problems from coming back. (Imputed Version). Imputation Rule: If less than 4 of SOC1_U through SOC18_U are missing and SOC16 missing then SOC16 = integer(median of non- missing(SOC1_U through SOC18_U)) |
1::4
|
1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
|
|
Query
|
soc17 |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Question 17. I am actively working on my problems. (Imputed Version). Imputation Rule: If less than 4 of SOC1_U through SOC18_U are missing and SOC17 missing then SOC17 = integer(median of non- missing(SOC1_U through SOC18_U)) |
1::4
|
1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
|
|
Query
|
soc18 |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
Question 18. After all I have done to try and change my problems, they sometimes come back to bother me. (Imputed Version). Imputation Rule: If less than 4 of SOC1_U through SOC18_U are missing and SOC18 missing then SOC18 = integer(median of non- missing(SOC1_U through SOC18_U)) |
1::4
|
1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree4 = Strongly Agree
|
|
Query
|
soctot |
Integer |
|
Recommended |
SOC Total Score (un-validated) using imputed values. |
18::72
|
Items included in score: SOC1, SOC2, SOC3, SOC4, SOC5, SOC6, SOC7, SOC8, SOC9, SOC10, SOC11, SOC12, SOC13, SOC14, SOC15, SOC16, SOC17, SOC18
|
|